Morris vetoes salary reduction bill

Slidell City Council needs six votes
to override veto

By Erik Sanzenbach
St. Tammany News
Published on Friday, July 17, 2009 9:27 AM CDT



Calling it “counterproductive,” Slidell Mayor Ben Morris has put his veto pen to a bill that would have lowered the salaries of the mayor, police chief and council members.

The bill was passed at the June 23 meeting of the City Council by a close vote of 5 to 4 over the objections of Morris and some on the council.

The bill was first introduced in May, and the original legislation called for a reduction of the mayor’s salary from $104,212 to $90,000 and the chief of police’s salary would have gone from $93,791 to $81,000. Some on the council wanted to even the playing field and reduce both salaries. According to the Louisiana Municipal Association, the Slidell mayor is the third-largest salary in the state with only the mayors of Baton Rouge and New Orleans earning more money. Several council members said the salary reduction was a way to save money in the current economic environment.

The bill was tabled, because Morris thought that the council should look to reducing their own salaries. The bill came off the table at the June 23 meeting with two amendments. First the council agreed to lower their salaries from $18,750 to $16,225 a year. Secondly, the ordinance would take effect July 1, 2009 but the salary cuts would start when the new mayor and council are elected in 2010.

In his veto message, Morris said that reducing the salary of the mayor would decrease the pool of qualified people who would run for the office.

“My only interest in the issue is that our city continues to move forward, not backward, and that our citizens have the best qualified individuals to select from for their future leaders,” Morris wrote.

However, other council members said that it should not be money that draws people into public service.

“We don’t do this job for the money. My satisfaction is in getting things done,” Councilman Lionel Hicks said.

Councilman at large Landon Cusimano said that the mayor is not taking the economy into consideration and the salary reduction is a way to save money.

“To be fair, we don’t want to stop qualified candidates,” Cusimano said. “But we don’t want someone who runs for the office just for the money.”

Morris is in his final term, and the legislation would not affect him. In fact, he has said several times in the past, that he doesn’t care if his salary is reduced. He reminded the council that the salaries for the mayor and the police chief have been frozen for the past two years. But he said that while the city is still recovering from Hurricane Katrina, the people need the best possible person to lead the city, and lowering the salary takes away from that goal.

To override the mayor’s veto, the council needs six votes. Councilperson at large, Kim Harbison, who voted against the bill, said she is not going to change her vote.

“I think it is a step backward. It won’t save the city much money,” Harbison said. “I think a better way to do it is to freeze the salaries.”

Besides Harbison, Councilmen Wayne Crockett, Bill Borchert and James Devereux voted against the bill.

Cusimano said the council is working on holding a special meeting next week, because he will be absent from the July 28 meeting. He said he doesn’t know if there are enough votes to override the mayor, but he thinks those that voted against the bill will listen to their constituents.

“I’m hoping public sentiment will change their minds,” Cusimano said.


Comments

5 comment(s)

    free speech wrote on Jul 31, 2009 10:30 AM:

    " I'm concerned that R.Side has no problems paying taxes to support a salary that is the third highest in the State for little podunk Slidell. To say our Mayor ranks right up there with the Mayor of New Orleans and Baton Rouge is absurd. It has to do with the position, not the person holding the position. So with this thinking Slidell with 26,000 pop. is almost equal to new Orleans with 250k pop and Baton Rouge with 160k pop.? "

    R. SIDE wrote on Jul 22, 2009 8:27 AM:

    " If you want the best medical care you go to the best doctors who get the best pay. If you want the best football team, you hire the best players at a cost. Slidell is a great place to live and work. We have some great people running our city. I support keeping the salary the way it is, I am glad to see my hard earned tax dollars going to hard working dedicated Americans! "

    free speech wrote on Jul 20, 2009 10:15 AM:

    " Let me make sure I have this right; a pay reduction will not have an impact on Morris but he voted against it. Slidell, population around 26,000 and we have the third highest paid mayor in the State...higher than Lafayette, Shreveport, Alexandria, Ruston, Lake Charles etc. What's wrong with this picture? "

    Matt Monus wrote on Jul 19, 2009 4:17 AM:

    " In this economy I don't think any of us want a pay cut. Being a Mayor isn't easy and I personally think his salary at present is appropriate.
    They shouldn't be singled out but with the job Nagin is doing, I'd recommend he be not given a pay cut but FIRED!!!!!

    Matt Monus "

    Evan wrote on Jul 17, 2009 9:55 AM:

    " Yeah, cutting your salaries may not save the city much money, but it says to the citizens of Slidell that our mayor is willing to sacrifice for his constituents. I guess thats too much to ask, though. "

WRITE A COMMENT

Use the form below to post a brief comment to this story, or respond to other readers. Please use the word count tool to assist you in keeping your remarks to 100 words or fewer.

Comment posters are responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. We urge comment writers to treat this as a public forum where manners matter. We encourage a collegial, non-insulting tone. All readers comments must be approved by our staff before posting to the Web site. They review submitted comments periodically during the day for offensive or off-topic content before posting. Be aware, in accordance with the Communications Decency Act and provisions upheld in judicial appeal, that you are responsible for comments posted on this Web site. The St. Tammany News is not liable for messages from third parties.

DO NOT POST:
* Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults or threats.
* The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
* Comments unrelated to the story.
* Personal Information (phone numbers, addresses, etc.)

Opinions, advice and all other information expressed in thesttammanynews.com's reader comments represent the individual's own views and not necessarily those of the St. Tammany News. The St. Tammany News does not endorse and is not responsible for statements, advice or opinions offered by anyone other than authorized St. Tammany News spokespersons.

Your thoughtful contribution to the online discussion is appreciated.

(optional)
Current Word Count: