Slidell dumpster ordinance sees some success

By Erik Sanzenbach
St. Tammany News
Published on Wednesday, August 6, 2008 8:43 AM CDT



In the year and a half since the Slidell City Council passed the dumpster ordinance, the results have been positive and negative.

The ordinance passed in December 2006 was meant to address the large number of open dumpsters on the streets and sidewalks of the city during the rebuilding after Hurricane Katrina. The ordinance mandates that all dumpsters must be in an enclosed area complete with a door so garbage trucks can lift the bins. Construction sites must set aside an area away from public view for the containers, and the bins cannot be placed on sidewalks.

Bill Mauser, chairman of the Keep Slidell Beautiful Committee and a proponent of the ordinance, said the results have been mixed. Mauser said most residents are good in bringing in their garbage cans, and the dumpster ordinance was meant for businesses.

This garbage bin on Pontchartrain Drive is in the correct enclosure, but the door to the enclosure has not been closed, and two old mattresses are on the outside instead of within the enclosure. (Staff Photo by Erik Sanzenbach)

“But now about 55 to 65 percent of the businesses are participating,” Mauser said.

For the past year, employees of the Slidell Department of Planning have been going out into the streets and telling businesses about the ordinance. Mauser said the campaign was going great until a few months ago when Planning Director Tim Jackson resigned.

“We have the ordinance, but no one knew about it,” Mauser said.

Still, a lot of enclosures have been built, and many businesses and apartment complexes have hidden their bins behind wooden fences.

“It’s had a definite impact,” Mauser said. But he said there is a lot of work to do to get everyone to comply. Mauser noted that some people have built the enclosures, but they do not close the doors. Some apartment buildings do not even have the enclosures, and some tenants at complexes with the enclosures are still putting their garbage outside the enclosures.

“We’ve gotten the message to the owners, now we have to get the message to the tenants,” Mauser said.

He is hoping that once new Planning Director Randy Clement starts later this week, there will be a concerted effort to get everyone to comply with the ordinance.

There are stiff penalties for not having the enclosures. The first offense is a fine from $100 to $250, plus four hours of community service.

The fine goes up to $350 for a second offense plus eight hours of community service. Any offense over the second time will mean a $500 fine, 24 hours of community service or six months in jail.

But Mauser doesn’t want to have to be so strict. He would rather people accept the ordinance and take pride in the appearance of Slidell. He hopes planning department employees can convince people of the necessity of the enclosures. For Mauser, it is a matter of education, not enforcement.

“We are heightening awareness on this,” Mauser said. “We are starting to change the culture.”


Comments

2 comment(s)

    lise wrote on Aug 9, 2008 4:49 PM:

    " I agree there are more important matters. Look at some of the junkie front yards in Slidell. Talk about a eye sore. The dumpsters look better "

    no name wrote on Aug 7, 2008 8:29 AM:

    " There are more important issues than hiding a dumpster, like widening the roads and opening another road from Airport Rd to Hwy 11. Traffic is horrible during rush hour, Christmas, or accidents. "

WRITE A COMMENT

Use the form below to post a brief comment to this story, or respond to other readers. Please use the word count tool to assist you in keeping your remarks to 100 words or fewer.

Comment posters are responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. We urge comment writers to treat this as a public forum where manners matter. We encourage a collegial, non-insulting tone. All readers comments must be approved by our staff before posting to the Web site. They review submitted comments periodically during the day for offensive or off-topic content before posting. Be aware, in accordance with the Communications Decency Act and provisions upheld in judicial appeal, that you are responsible for comments posted on this Web site. The St. Tammany News is not liable for messages from third parties.

DO NOT POST:
* Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults or threats.
* The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
* Comments unrelated to the story.
* Personal Information (phone numbers, addresses, etc.)

Opinions, advice and all other information expressed in thesttammanynews.com's reader comments represent the individual's own views and not necessarily those of the St. Tammany News. The St. Tammany News does not endorse and is not responsible for statements, advice or opinions offered by anyone other than authorized St. Tammany News spokespersons.

Your thoughtful contribution to the online discussion is appreciated.

(optional)
Current Word Count: