Where will the mud go?

Golf course retention pond worries residents

By Erik Sanzenbach
St. Tammany News
Published on Monday, July 28, 2008 9:24 AM CDT



A retention pond is being built between the 17th and 18th holes at the Pinewood Country Club golf course, and residents who live along the course are concerned about the mounds of mud and dirt being piled up next to their houses.

“This is very scary,” said Kathy Daspit, who has lived on Country Club Boulevard since 1978. She said she woke up one morning and saw a mound “7 feet high of mud” on the edge of her property.

Daspit and her neighbors are scared the dirt will raise the elevation of the golf course, and the next time there is a heavy rain it will drain off the fairways and into their back yards, flooding their houses.

A golfer tees it up on the 16th hole of the Pinewood Country Club golf course as a power shovel behind him excavates a new retention pond to alleviate flooding in the area. (Staff Photo by Erik Sanzenbach)

The retention pond is a city project designed to prevent such flooding, but the neighbors are not convinced.

“The retention pond is fine, but we were not told about all this dirt,” said Daspit’s neighbor, Teresa Stanley.

The anger over the mounds of dirt has reached the ears of District G Councilman Bill Borchert and Slidell Mayor Ben Morris.

“I’ve been getting lots and lots of phone calls about this,” Borchert said. Morris said his staff members have taken a lot of calls about the pond and the dirt.

To ease his constituents’ fears, Borchert has called for a public meeting at 7 p.m. Thursday at the Pinewood Country Club clubhouse. He said he, city engineers and contractors will be there to “educate the residents and dispel their fears.”

The retention pond, when finished, will hold 2.5 million gallons of water and will be 7 feet deep. The project will take about seven weeks to finish and will cost $201,000 from the city coffers, Morris said.

Pinewood Country Club donated the land to the city, and the club will maintain the pond once it is finished, Borchert said.

The idea is for the pond to fill up with rainwater that will slowly be released into the city’s drainage system after a storm. There are two other retention ponds on the golf course, and they are all linked by pipes to the drainage canal behind the golf course. Letting the water collect in the pond and then slowly releasing is supposed to prevent flooding.

“It is designed to improve drainage and eliminate flooding along that part of the street,” Borchert said.

Despite those claims, neighbors think the golf course will use all that dirt to elevate the course and make it higher than their properties.

“The water will drain toward the houses,” Stanley said.

The mayor said to cut costs, the city decided to give the dirt to the golf club rather than pay to have it hauled away. Thursday, Morris said he, too, was surprised at the piles of dirt.

“We didn’t expect it to be piled up like that,” Morris said. “But when the project is finished, the mounds will disappear.”

Jim Pittman, representing the construction company Coast 2 Coast Construction that is building the pond, agreed.

He said the dirt will be used to build up the bunkers on the course and add more challenges to the golfers. Pinewood has brought in a golf course engineer, who is designing a new look for the course.

“It will make the holes more challenging,” Pittman said.

Stanley and Daspit have their doubts. Both of them had their houses flooded in 1998 and 2001, and they don’t want a repeat.

“Where is all that mud going to go?” questioned Stanley.

“They can’t level off those hills,” Daspit said. “It will raise the elevation of the course, and water will flow into our houses.”

Both ladies are not against having a retention pond or redesigning the golf course. They just want the city and the country club to get rid of the mud.

“This is just not a good idea,” Daspit said.

The neighbors are also angry at the city for not informing them about the mess that has been created.

Morris admitted the city should have communicated better with the residents.

“I apologize, but the project will improve drainage in the area and stop the flooding,” Morris said.

Borchert looks at the project as a work in progress and asks for patience from the residents.

“It’s not finished. It is a seven-week project, and let’s let them finish,” Borchert said.

Daspit said she already pays expensive premiums for flood insurance and wonders if it is a city project, shouldn’t the city be more responsible to the residents?

“Maybe the city could help us with elevating our homes,” suggested Daspit.

But Pittman said the course is not being elevated. He said a project like that would be financially prohibitive. The club is just adding some bunkers and improving the golf course, he said.

“I think it is very innovative for the city and the club to get together on this,” Pittman said. “It’s a win-win situation for everybody. The city gets better drainage, and the club will have water to irrigate the grass.”

Still, Daspit and her neighbors are skeptical, and Borchert urged them to come to the meeting Thursday.


Comments

3 comment(s)

    pat wrote on Jul 31, 2008 6:39 AM:

    " As with any project or job being done I find people complain right away. "As long as they are not the one doing the work." Why is it that no one can wait until the project is finished. With most projects from painting, sheetrock, cabinets, driveways, gardening, etc. noone waits until the end to speak their opinion of the work. Please people if you are not doing the work have paitence for the people who are . They are doing the best to be neat and get it done right, even with some debris. Please wait till it is done. "

    Forrest wrote on Jul 29, 2008 7:42 AM:

    " It's a very simple process....ask to see the plan from both the City and the golf course. One should be able to ascertain the elevations based on contours. Surely there are plans. Bunkers on golf courses are depressions usually filled with sand whereas berms are earth mounds. At least with the contours indicated on the plans one will be able to see where the water will drain. "

    Lonnie Fontenot wrote on Jul 28, 2008 9:27 PM:

    " I wish I had that problem, I would love to see a retention pond on Lake Ramsey Road.
    Thanks Lonnie "

WRITE A COMMENT

Use the form below to post a brief comment to this story, or respond to other readers. Please use the word count tool to assist you in keeping your remarks to 100 words or fewer.

Comment posters are responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. We urge comment writers to treat this as a public forum where manners matter. We encourage a collegial, non-insulting tone. All readers comments must be approved by our staff before posting to the Web site. They review submitted comments periodically during the day for offensive or off-topic content before posting. Be aware, in accordance with the Communications Decency Act and provisions upheld in judicial appeal, that you are responsible for comments posted on this Web site. The St. Tammany News is not liable for messages from third parties.

DO NOT POST:
* Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults or threats.
* The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
* Comments unrelated to the story.
* Personal Information (phone numbers, addresses, etc.)

Opinions, advice and all other information expressed in thesttammanynews.com's reader comments represent the individual's own views and not necessarily those of the St. Tammany News. The St. Tammany News does not endorse and is not responsible for statements, advice or opinions offered by anyone other than authorized St. Tammany News spokespersons.

Your thoughtful contribution to the online discussion is appreciated.

(optional)
Current Word Count: